Internet Users Share Acclaimed 'Masterpieces' They Don't Understand the Hype For, Sparking Heated Debates
Sayart
sayart2022@gmail.com | 2025-09-28 14:38:03
A recent Reddit discussion has ignited passionate debates about widely celebrated works of art, literature, film, and music that some people simply don't connect with. The original post, which asked users to share "universally acclaimed masterpieces" they don't understand the hype for, generated hundreds of responses spanning everything from classic paintings to blockbuster movies.
Among the most controversial takes was criticism of renowned pop artist Andy Warhol, with one user describing his work as "pretentious, unskilled, and fraudulent." The commenter argued that Warhol's body of work "forever cheapened the art form and traded on a false narrative and privilege that came at a cost to art in general." They particularly criticized the emotional detachment in his pieces, calling them "boring" and claiming they "give off no emotion, which he celebrated as mastery."
Several Hollywood classics also came under fire, including the sci-fi masterpiece "Blade Runner." One user expressed frustration at finding the film boring despite having all the elements they should love, including "gritty '80s neo-noir sci-fi, ethical questions about artificial slavery and genetic privacy, beautifully shot, impressive digital and practical effects, and Harrison Ford." Similarly, "Titanic" was dismissed by another commenter, while "Once Upon a Time in Hollywood" was described as "very meh" despite being touted by Quentin Tarantino himself as his masterpiece.
Literature wasn't spared from criticism either, with "The Catcher in the Rye" receiving particularly harsh judgment. One reader admitted to stopping "10 pages short of the end just to send a message," while "The Little Prince" was criticized by someone who "read it as a kid, hated it, tried again as an adult, hated it even more." The classic "The Wizard of Oz" also made the list, though the commenter noted they had "nothing against it" but found it simply wasn't their "cup of tea."
In the visual arts category, Jackson Pollock's abstract expressionist paintings drew skepticism, with one user questioning what "the second or third piece" adds to the conversation after establishing that "spatter can be art too." However, another commenter provided educational context, explaining that abstract expressionism aimed to "make the medium the subject" by removing traditional subjects like landscapes or portraits to focus purely on colors and composition. Even Leonardo da Vinci's "Mona Lisa" wasn't immune to criticism.
Music faced its share of detractors as well, with John Lennon's "Imagine" receiving pointed criticism for its perceived hypocrisy. One user noted the contradiction between the lyrics "Imagine no possessions, I wonder if you can" and Lennon's reported net worth of $800 million at his death, sarcastically commenting, "I guess he just couldn't imagine scraping by with only 100 or 200 million." The influential British band The Smiths also drew criticism from a user who tried hard to appreciate them but found that "the melodies, his voice...they just do absolutely nothing for me."
Television and streaming content weren't overlooked in the discussion. HBO's critically acclaimed series "The White Lotus" was compared to "watching the Kardashians in non-reality format," with the critic describing it as "just a bunch of rich people endlessly on vacation, gossiping, backstabbing, screwing, and doing drugs with each other while making rich person complaints." "Game of Thrones" was criticized for dragging despite having "some memorable moments," while "Succession" was dismissed as repetitive and predictable.
Some of the most passionate responses came regarding beloved franchises and cultural phenomena. "Star Wars" received particularly harsh criticism from one user who expressed frustration with its enduring popularity, exclaiming, "God, enough already. It's not that good. 45 f***ing years and people won't shut up about it." The musical "Hamilton" was mentioned multiple times, though one commenter noted it was "more spectacle than substance" but acknowledged it could be "really fun" when seen live with good seats.
Recent blockbusters also faced scrutiny, with James Cameron's "Avatar" movies criticized for spending "months, if not years, getting hyped up, only to never be talked about again after the cinema run." Denis Villeneuve's "Dune" adaptations were mentioned without elaboration, while Christopher Nolan's "Interstellar" was called boring despite acknowledgment that "the visuals are great and honestly amazing."
The discussion revealed interesting patterns in how people relate to acclaimed works, with many commenters emphasizing that their inability to connect with these pieces doesn't necessarily diminish their objective quality or cultural importance. Some users provided educational context for works they personally didn't enjoy, demonstrating the complex relationship between personal taste and critical consensus. The thread ultimately highlighted the subjective nature of artistic appreciation and the ongoing debates about what makes something truly deserving of "masterpiece" status in popular culture.
WEEKLY HOT
- 1Seoul International Fireworks Festival Expected to Draw Massive Crowds and Create Traffic Disruptions This Saturday
- 2Tigers Extinct in Nature, Alive in the Korean Imagination
- 3FanX Comic Convention Implements Ban on AI-Generated Artwork to Support Original Artists
- 4Netflix's 'Mantis' Spinoff from 'Kill Boksoon' Features Im Si-wan in Stylized Action Thriller
- 5Interior Designers Reveal Fall 2025 Décor Trends That Are Already Taking Over American Homes
- 6Fall 2025 Home Decor: Trending Colors to Embrace and Outdated Hues to Avoid