In October 2025, Donald Trump threatened 100% duties on all Chinese imports effective November 1, a dramatic escalation that rattled global markets and reopened questions the art trade has been dodging since spring: even if most original artworks remain duty-free on paper, can the ecosystem that moves, finances, and buys them withstand another trade shock? According to the Guardian’s same-day coverage of the announcement, equities swooned and traders braced for further volatility as the clock ticked toward implementation. New York Post

As Frieze London opens with outsized symbolic weight this season, the Financial Times notes the broader market remains under strain: global art sales fell about 12% last year to $57.5 billion, with China especially weak amid property-sector turmoil, and with higher transaction and logistics costs now weighing on collector appetite despite record stock indices. The paper frames Frieze as a temperature check for a market that’s resilient at the low end but hesitant at the top. Financial Times

Dealers on the ground describe a season of whiplash decisions and contingency plans. “This is the most challenging moment for galleries in at least 20 years… it requires patience,” artist Sanford Biggers said at New York’s Armory Show VIP day in early September, as reported by Katya Kazakina. Dallas dealer Bart Keijsers Koning—invited to fill a last-minute slot after another gallery pulled out “due to tariffs,” he was told—drove artworks 1,550 miles to New York in a frantic pivot. “You can’t sit still,” he said, adding that collectors were browsing for clients who might circle back later. Blue-chip dealer Per Skarstedt, who dropped Frieze Seoul to do Armory for the first time, pointed to cost differentials: “It costs $300,000 to $400,000 to do a fair in Asia… in New York, I’m paying $60,000,” while still reporting sales and “optimism.” Artnet News

Macro pressure is showing up not only as hard costs but as psychology. Artnet’s early-October roundtable distilled the mood: liquidity is thinner, pricing discipline is back, and younger buyers remain active but more selective; some advisors are even urging established artists to test lower pricing or different formats to meet the moment. The debate’s through-line was less panic than pragmatism—an insistence that new models (itinerant galleries, dealer-led boutique fairs) will proliferate as legacy structures flex. Artnet News

Fresh data since early September underline the reset. Artnet’s mid-year Intelligence Report put first-half 2025 fine-art auction sales at $4.72 billion, down 8.8% year-over-year and 40.9% below the first half of 2022, while New York fair coverage documented cancellations, late switches, and cost-cutting everywhere from shipping to booth build-outs. The Art Dealers Association of America even cancelled its long-running The Art Show this year—a symbolic pause that seasoned observers didn’t take lightly. Artnet News

If the looming 100% China tariffs land as signaled, the art trade’s “collateral channels” are where pain will bite first: foundries and fabricators in Asia; framing, packing, and specialty materials; and the time-sensitive, paperwork-heavy logistics that already slowed under 2025’s earlier tariff program. Markets now price not only the possibility of extra duties on inputs but the uncertainty of classification disputes and transit delays—exactly the frictions that make six-figure consignments hard to green-light and seven-figure ones easy to postpone. That’s why, in the words of one luxury-sector watcher this month, collectors and dealers are grappling with “confusion over classification, origin, and customs paperwork” that materially raises transaction costs. Financial Times

The geography of risk is shifting, too. In the past five weeks, reporting has highlighted tactical rerouting of inventories and itineraries: Asia shows dropped in favor of lower-cost U.S. or European fairs; more works staged in freeports; more private-sale negotiations conducted off-calendar and off-shore. Meanwhile, pricing power has migrated toward buyers. A September snapshot described a 10%–25% bargaining window on blue-chip private sales—an unthinkable spread two years ago and a telling measure of today’s leverage. Artnet News+1

Voices from the field capture the paradox: stamina amid strain. “People who are liquid right now… are probably finding it a very good time to buy,” Kazakina summarized after her public Q&A with Artnet’s Naomi Rea, arguing that contractions have historically seeded great collections (Broad, Glenstone) when disciplined buyers lean in. But she also acknowledged “a very unusual contraction this time,” given simultaneous macro headwinds, higher cost of capital, and policy uncertainty. Artnet News

Two near-term swing factors now hang over the trade. First, the policy path: the October tariff threat was framed by headlines as leverage ahead of high-level meetings; if it’s modified, delayed, or litigated—as elements of the spring program already were—the chill could ease. If it’s enforced as stated, expect immediate pass-through into materials, logistics, and scheduling for U.S.-bound shows and museum loans, with second-order effects on price guidance and guarantees this auction season. Second, the calendar: with Frieze London and subsequent sales weeks acting as stress tests, dealers will decide whether to hold stock through winter or meet buyers at newly realistic levels—decisions that will feed into the spring cycle. 뉴욕 포스트+1

Looking forward, three scenarios dominate back-room conversations. One envisions a soft landing: headline tariffs get walked back or carved up, fairs stabilize, and private sales quietly refill the pipeline. A second maps a dual-track market: sub-$250,000 segments remain active (fueled by new collectors and corporate buyers), while $1m–$50m works trade less frequently and at tighter estimates until financing costs fall. A third sketches a hub shift: London, Geneva, Singapore, and Hong Kong claw share as routing and confidence favor jurisdictions perceived as legally and logistically predictable—especially for Asia-to-Europe flows. All three scenarios assume continued ingenuity from galleries (lean teams, pop-ups, co-ops) and more transparency from advisors on fair-cost math. -----Artnet News+1

The critique of Trump-era tariff maximalism, from the vantage of culture and soft power, is straightforward: it treats a symbolic, transnational sector as if it were steel. The result isn’t targeted protection but ambient volatility—exactly the condition that freezes seven-figure checks, snarls museum loans, and encourages risk-off storage rather than circulation. Whether November 1 brings a cliff or a compromise, the last six weeks have already rewritten behavior: buyers negotiate harder, sellers price closer to reality, and organizers choose routes and venues with a customs officer in mind. If the U.S. wants to remain the world’s most dynamic marketplace for art, it will need not only fair taxes but predictable rules—and a trade posture that recognizes how culture actually moves.

SayArt.net
Jason Yim yimjongho1969@gmail.com