A new comprehensive salary survey has revealed troubling compensation trends for early-career architects in the United Kingdom, with the majority of Part 1 architectural assistants earning below the established London living wage. The Pay 100 survey for 2025 highlights persistent challenges in architectural education and career progression, particularly affecting those at the entry level of the profession.

The survey findings indicate that most architectural assistants who have completed their Part 1 qualification are struggling to achieve basic living wage standards, particularly in expensive urban markets like London. This compensation gap has significant implications for the diversity and accessibility of the architectural profession, potentially creating barriers for individuals from lower-income backgrounds who cannot afford to work for below-living-wage salaries while pursuing their professional development.

The architectural career path in the UK follows a structured progression system, with Part 1 representing the completion of an undergraduate architecture degree. These early-career professionals typically work in architectural firms while gaining practical experience before proceeding to Part 2 studies and eventually Part 3 qualification to become fully registered architects. However, the survey data suggests that the financial challenges during this initial phase may be deterring talented individuals from continuing in the profession.

Industry experts have expressed concern about the long-term implications of these compensation trends for the architectural profession. The inability to offer competitive entry-level salaries may limit the pool of available talent and disproportionately affect candidates who lack family financial support during their early career years. This situation could ultimately impact the profession's ability to attract diverse perspectives and maintain a robust pipeline of future architects.

The survey results come at a time when the construction and design industries are facing significant challenges, including economic uncertainty, changing market demands, and increasing emphasis on sustainable design practices. These factors may be contributing to firms' reluctance to increase entry-level compensation, creating a challenging cycle for new professionals entering the field.

The findings also raise questions about the sustainability of the current architectural education and training model, particularly given the extended period of study and practical experience required to achieve full professional qualification. Many Part 1 graduates face the prospect of several more years of education and training while earning below-living-wage salaries, creating financial pressures that may force some to leave the profession entirely.